LAMB’S BOOK OF LIFE …

p08law

I have this theory. I wonder if our interpretations of ancient texts – yes, even the bible – aren’t often misunderstandings of skewed translations of things that are true but …not exactly what was meant. You know …we miss one little punctuation mark here or misinterpret two little umlauts there and viola …we’re instructed to marry our sisters and only eat goat feet. And if we don’t, we can’t get into heaven.

Please …Christians …don’t crucify me with emails. It’s just a thought.

I’ve always been intrigued by the biblical “lamb’s book of life.” It’s supposed to be a book – a complete record – of everything everyone on earth has ever said or done. Even as a youngster, listening to my father preaching about this huge book, I secretly questioned the size and scope of such a document. It would have to be volumes and volumes of mundane text.

I always imagined how it would be full of “got up and brushed teeth …watched a bird on the window sill …yawned …etc” before we got to anything juicy. And I always hated the idea of having to stand there and listen to every single thing every single person ever said or did. It sounded like the most horribly boring day imaginable.

But what if that “book” was something like “Facebook.” What if God wasn’t writing it all down at all. What if WE were writing it all down …voluntarily? Now THAT’S a lot more interesting. And it also works in concert with the notions of consciousness and confession and the confronting of one’s own self.

What if, at some judgement we have completely misinterpreted, you have to come face to face with YOU. What if it’s not some third-party judge imposing a narrative on you that is in dispute. What if it’s actually YOU having to come to terms with YOU? YOUR own words. YOUR own thoughts. YOU wrote them …yourself.

For reasons such as this (and many more) I am a fierce defender of the first amendment. I actually think you SHOULD be able to yell “fire” in a crowded movie theater. Because if you were to do something like that, we would know what kind of a person you are. We would need no judge and jury. You’ve removed all doubt about who and what you are willing to do. It’s the purest judgement of all. The judgement of one’s own words.

Freedom of speech isn’t just a right so everyone can speak without being arrested. It allows us to assess dispassionately. It was a genius move to make it the very FIRST right. Because of it, I can sit back and let you tell me exactly who you are. I don’t have to judge or make assumptions or speculate. If I am quiet enough, for long enough …and you are verbal enough, for long enough …I will know everything I need to know about you. You will tell me. I won’t have to guess.

This is why we should never shut down speech. MORE speech is important. It’s necessary. Even if we hate what someone is saying …let them say it. They are writing their own judgement of themselves.

What we say and sing and write is everything. It’s the story of who we are …and who we’re not. This is why I so adore songwriting. It is the ultimate glimpse into the soul. If you write enough songs, we will know who you are as a person. You will tell us. If someone writes great songs, they might seem like a horrible person on the outside …but there’s a gem in there, somewhere. The songs tell all.

I strongly suggest that everyone on planet earth write a memoir about themselves and their lives. Everyone has a fascinating story whether they believe it or not. But more than that, I can tell you from personal experience that writing about yourself makes you face hard truths about who you are. We all see ourselves as the innocent hero of our own story. But writing about yourself honestly, often reveals your own prejudices and downfalls and imperfections and low-road patterns.

We’re watching people riot right now because they are upset at certain kinds of speech. I don’t know about you, but I’d love a day …just any old day …without a freaking protest in this country. But I digress …

While we’re waiting on that day, I think we should keep in mind that speech – especially speech we abhor – is important. All of it. Shutting it down is the wrong thing to do. Illuminating it is the answer. Make people come face to face with their own words. Make them hear themselves. Allow them to show us who they are. Then let the world judge.

I get at least one private message a week asking me how I can tolerate keeping this person or that person in my social media circle and on my feed. I purposely keep people on the hard right and the hard left. And I welcome them equally. I do this because I want to hear what people – ALL people – have to say. I’m just observing. Those people are writing the record of their lives …whether they know it or not.

Maybe one day we will stand before a heavenly judge. If we do, trust me …I’ll have plenty to answer for. But I want my book to be honest and heartfelt and thoughtful. I don’t want it to show someone who backed down from conflict or disagreement. But I also don’t want it show someone who disrespected or discounted. I certainly don’t want it to read like some “to whom it may concern” angry letter.

I always ask myself, when I write a song or a blog or a book or a post, “would I want this said or sung at my funeral?” And maybe, more to the point …my after life.

If we’re all writing our own judgement story, and some angel is gonna read all this one day, I want mine to be a good read …with humor and grace and a full heart. Not just a bunch of insults hurled at people I didn’t like.

Because God knows with my grammar and spelling it’s gonna be hard enough to get into heaven.

 

 

R

Advertisements

19 thoughts on “LAMB’S BOOK OF LIFE …

  1. Thank you Regi for this post. I love the out of box thinking on this subject. I’ve been very disturbed the last year or more by all the hate and vicious posts I’ve seen out there. I’ve contemplated exiting from the Facebook world completely due to the noise. Now I have a different perspective next time I’m faced with these posts that hurt my eyes or heart.

    Liked by 4 people

  2. Free speech isn’t free when others pay a cost for it. Yelling fire in a movie theater is ok? Maybe, until your daughter is trampled to death in the ensuing panic. But, yes, we would then know what kind of person the shouter is, and oh, that would make it all ok. Free speech should have limitations.

    Like

  3. I know your point was pretty far away from this, but I wanted to point out that the basic title premise of this post is a bit flawed from a biblical POV.

    The Lambs “Book of Life” is simply a list of names, like a phone book. The determining factor as to whether your name is in that directory is your faith in the gospel: The death, burial, and resurrection of Christ fulfilling role as the once-and-for-all eternal sacrificial Passover lamb and scapegoat (as was done each year in ancient Israel for the sins of the people)… as well as the high priest which presents the blood in the Holy of Holies.

    Romans chapter 2 really explains in depth the full impact of this recording of deeds concept, which is only briefly mentioned in Revelations (where the name of “the Lambs Book of Life” is used).

    To get at the deeds of a persons life Christ will go to the other books for your deeds, after ascertaining your name is not in the Book of Life.

    It may seem to be ancillary to your point, but it was enough of a mistake to take me out of the flow of reading.

    Like

  4. There are so many people readying 1 book, yet ask them, so what do you think and you will have so many different responses. That is in my opinion what stirs judgement (ok hate).

    Yes to all the grammar police have away with my run on sentence, it does not harm me

    Like

  5. I’m new to your blog, many thanks for this. What a life you lead! My main side thought on all this probably very obvious. It is how the “standard” polar ways of thinkinng (or at least the “choices” we’ve had presented to us in the past) no longer hold. Thinking people now have much more freedom to create their own fluid agendas irrespective of false dichotomies, based more on fundamentals than structured and outworn structures. Positively in your case the fundamentals appear to be compassion and understanding. This might sound like utopian navel gazing but of course compassion and understanding can be just as tough and decisive as their opposite in the real world. All power to you and yours!

    Like

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s